Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Thursday, October 13, 2016
LIBERUM SPIRITA
Just
because we cannot see something doesn't mean it ceases to exist. I
have come to redefine some things I had thought to have had a
reputation of being nefarious in my past... such as death and desire.
Desire is a key part of exploring a spiritual life because it
inspires the energy and insight to contribute our lives to the
present, collectively with purpose. My deepest desire is to breathe
into my next breath by understanding there is no such thing as death,
no such thing as limitations, there is no end to any truth. There is
an affinity to the absolute sense of infinity. If we can understand
libido as infinite, then it is “absolutely” immortal. If we can
pause intellectualizing every breath, every thought, every moment,
and close our eyes and perpetuate our deepest unhampered desires, we
create a dream.
Dreams are the premonitions toward an evolving
future, a higher consciousness. I seek to ask a question in my work
that I find constantly asking myself, “Do you know what your dreams
mean?”
There
is a universe in each and every one of us. Everything that composes
the human body makes a star, comes from a star, returns to the stars.
Carbon for our muscles. Iron for our blood. Calcium for our bones.
Oxygen for our breath. Light matter. Dark matter. We are both and we
are all, all at once, every moment. Forever. However, we are more. We
are fountains of energy. We are in constant movement, constantly
shining. Even when still, our blood and our breath stir within us...
and we come into our presence. We are omnipotent.
*Birdo
Beaverhousen is an artist. Psychologist. Athlete. Social butterfly.
Romantic. Anti-artist. Visionary. Delinquent. Jesuit. Orator.
Diplomat. Profane. Writer. Joker. Believer.
*Birdo
Beaverhousen was born in 1977. As a native Chicagoan, Birdo has persistently
remained devoted to his artistic vision and Thomism philosophy of
immortality. He is a self-taught artist who's process invites the
observer into a dialogue using all forms of communication possible,
whether it be abstract or everyday interaction, “...if art is to
live, then it must be emphasized in the most immediate and common
objects and experiences in life. Art is not something you do, it is a
place you go within yourself and with the observer.” His work
emphasizes darker dreams, nocturnal desires and the duality of what
one would commonly shun during the light of day, yet connect to other
parts during the night. He divides his time between social work and enrichment with
the homeless and ex addict re-entries, fund raising for social causes, training for
professional marathons, and traveling the world to explore urban
culture.
1.Ex Mortis (24x36, Mixed media on paper)
2.Divinity (24x36, Mixed media on paper)
3.The Iron Empress (24x36, Mixed media on paper)
4. Invocare Spirita (24x36, Mixed media on paper)
5. Elysium (24x36, Mixed media on paper)
Monday, January 18, 2016
The Unity Of Martin Luther King
What
makes a leader? What separates a leader from a manager and employee?
What separates one from the crowd, from the pack? That others can
look at him/her and say, “You are different. You are special. You
are anointed. You are appointed. You are someone I would like to
know. You are someone I would like to follow.” Who unifies you?
What can unify the garbage man and the politician? Who shares your
vision and strengthens what you believe. The belief that allows you a
sense of relief that you are not alone in this world. A belief that
you will be understood. A belief that grants your life meaning in
your every movement. A belief that even when you are alone, you are
alone with everyone, together. Are you the beacon of justice and
balance that holds both sides together? Is your consciousness awaken
to what you think you believe? Are you thinking about what you are
thinking about? Do others believe in what you are thinking? Do you
understand who are? Do you know what your dreams mean?
Longevity has its place. A long life is a common goal that unites us
all as human beings. It is a basic point of commencement. The
precious price of life, the value, the worth, is what Martin Luther
King's life long work has addressed as a basic right for all. In his
non-violent scope of the struggle for basic human civil rights, he
lead people toward their importance and awakened their desire for
distinction. He empowered those who never considered themselves
worthy or capable of having power, of being first. He demonstrated
how we all have the power to share and have the equal opportunity to
tap into this powerful collective consciousness. MLK stressed how we
all have the opportunity and the right to create our own
opportunities, to navigate our own destinies and author our own
legacies. How dominance is seen through prominence and prevalence NOT
violence and hatred. He urged his followers to harness their
instincts in order not to deviate their personalities, deviate
society. We all have the right to attention and there is no reason to
push others down in order to rise up. There is no reason to classism
and exclusivity. How everyone counts in priceless amounts.
The
purpose of this essay is not to outline the life and history of MLK,
for that would be a feat. Instead, it is about his vision and
synergy that unified a nation that began with a man who had a dream,
a significance that perpetuates to this day. This essay is in light
of his historical demonstrations that organized a culture and brought
to light the ethical responsibility and accountability we have for
one another as human beings first, then American citizens second.
Doctor Martin Luther King was most recognized for the power of his
words as an excellent orator. With his spirit of integral belief and
the power of his intellectual intelligence, MLK raised a kingdom
from ashes and left a legacy that continues to do so to this day.
How
do you explain when others are able to achieve things which defy all
other assumptions? Simply that, by not plotting out achievement but
being what you believe in, being yourself and doing so with
authenticity. There is a collective force that binds us all, a
mentality that draws us closer to one another, an affinity to share
in each others lives. MLK emphasized we must be both, master and
servant, simultaneously. It was in this perspective that it was the
easiest way to understand one another. If you don't understand one
another then you don't understand purpose. His theories not only
challenged the norm but challenged authority as we had come to know
it. “Creative Maladjusted Nonconformity” is what he considered
his non-violent activism. And with his distinguished revolutionary
concept he brought into focus a concentrated vision which unified an
American nation.
A
number of researchers, scholarly doctors, intellects, historians,
etc... have sought used various aspects of arts and sciences to
translate the individualism of MLK in order to understand his power
of charismatic leadership.
"Power,
properly understood, is the ability to achieve purpose. It IS the
strength required to bring about social, political or economic
changes. In this sense power is not only desirable but necessary in
order to implement the demands of love and Justice... Power at its
best is love implementing the demands of justice." (Martin
Luther King, Jr., 1967)
Where
did MLK attain his power if he was faced limited opportunities
growing up as a black male from a middle class baptist family in
Atlanta, Georgia? His secure upbringing did not shield him from
segregation in the south. It was not until MLK worked on a tobacco
farm one summer in Connecticut, before entering college, that the
seed of change had been planted in his perspective. His exposure to
the lifestyle of the North had fueled his hatred for segregation even
further. Little by little, his power began to grow.
“At
Morehouse, King favoured studies in medicine and law, but these were
eclipsed in his senior year by a decision to enter the ministry, as
his father had urged. King's mentor at Morehouse was the college
president, Benjamin Mays, a social gospel activist whose rich oratory
and progressive ideas had left an indelible imprint on King's father.
Committed to fighting racial inequality, Mays accused the
African-American community of complacency in the face of oppression,
and he prodded the black church into social action by criticizing its
emphasis on the hereafter instead of the here and now; it was a call
to service that was not lost on the teenage King. He graduated from
Morehouse in 1948.” (Britannica, Biography, Martin-Luther-King-Jr)
The
here and now was his realization of what his purpose was, to unify
and lead a people out of repression. A revolution. A call to action.
He wanted to address the problem of the enemy not being out there,
but the enemy being within- discrimination, intolerance, a lack of
desire putting his fellow men into a trance of conformity, an excuse
to do nothing. He also saw people desperate for a change, for a way
to a better well-being. It was important for him to be taken
seriously, so he had to address the opposing argument, the adverse
side with skill, confidence, competence, developing his position
concisely. Documenting and comparing what is and what could be. It
was not enough to wake his fellow man up, he had to give them tools
so they didn't fall back asleep again. Effective refutation takes
many forms. He responded to authority not with hate speech of defense
but by offering the best possible solutions in common. He earned his
power to persuade by examining the best evidence on both sides. His
intelligent inquiry built his profound rhetoric which became his
license to state his position effectively to all who heard him speak.
Whether they were a favorable or unfavorable audience, one thing was
absolute, not an ear fell neutral to his words.
Why
is it that Martin-Luther-King-Jr led the civil rights movement? He
wasn't the only man who lived in a pre-civil rights America. He
wasn't the only great orator of the day. Why him? Many people are
good at what they do. The thing that differentiates leaders from
others is that leaders know why they do it. The secret to their power
of leading is they not only know why, but they believe in why they do
it. “WHY” is the symbol for what is your purpose, cause and
belief. Why does the “organization” you lead, exist. What drives
you to this existence and why should people care? People want the
easy answers. They want the obvious surface information easily.
However leadership is not an external force. It begins from within.
MLK reversed the order of the information. In place of waiting to be
told, he defined what is and what we can do. He was an innovator
because he did it first. He made it clear that it was being first was
not about class or placement, it was about the right to the freedom
to that right.
One
of his famous speeches, “The Drum Major Instinct” sermon, he
describes being one of the times he was incarcerated in Birmingham,
Alabama during his campaign for civil rights in 1963. He took this
opportunity to convert through an open calm dialogue with inmates and
wardens. And they they stated their case against him, how he should
not be protesting and how it was wrong for the whole campaign to
oppose what is and how segregation was so right. Then the discussion
came to the point to talk about where they lived and how much they
earned...
MLK:
“You know what? You ought to be marching with us. You're just as
poor as a negro. And I said, you are put in the position of
supporting your oppressor. Because through prejudice and blindness
you've failed to see that the same forces in society that oppress
Negroes oppress poor white people. And all you are living on is that
satisfaction of your skin being white and the “Drum Major Instinct”
thinking that you are somebody “big” because your white. And
you're so poor you can't send your children to school. You ought to
be out here marching with every one of us every time we have a
march.” (“The Drum Major” Sermon, Martin-Luther-King-Jr.,
Delivered
to his congregation Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia on
February 4, 1968.)
MLK's
focused approach to the root of the problem was truthful, ethical,
and respectful. He listened to what they had to say then
charismatically reversed the perspective and revealed something going
on they chose to ignore because all they ever knew was what they did.
MLK's goal was not give them something they didn't have, his goal was
to show his opponents that they had already believed in the same
thing. He understood opportunity as not chance, but a right that
should be withing everyone's grasp and a right that should not be
denied by classism, racism, and elite hierarchy.
The authenticity of MLK's speech deliverance portrayed his ingenuity
of how and why he felt about what he was doing. He spoke from the
heart and not just in structure, he spoke from his heart. He
knew the “why” and that is “how” he got people to follow him
loyally, that is how people came to trust him because he spoke with
truth. MLK emphasized how people were forced to be segregated and
that there was an alternative, it was freedom. It was the alternate
change and this was a change he was inviting his fellow brother and
sisters to take part in. Empowerment was within grasp, it had always
been, and he was waking people to the fact that NOW is the time to
grasp it not the hereafter. Empowerment was a way to improve
communication, a way for him to relate to his followers and increase
their feelings of self-efficacy. He encouraged his followers to be
involved in decision making that pertained to their livelihood, to
take responsibility for their actions, and provide input for
improving their own organization, The Cause.
“The
Cause,” the purpose, the belief, is what drove MLK to believe that
if he could figure out the course to civil rights, it would change
the course of the nation. The wardens, guards and other white people
whom MLK addressed in jail were looking for the result, the surface
value, the easy answer to their complacency, their pursuit to the
easy life. The people who believed in
MLK's mission worked with him with blood, sweat, and tears. The
former just worked for the paycheck. On July 2, 1964, the simple
stroke of a pen changed the nation and the civil rights movement took
flight.
“At
the end of the Second World War, those of us who had participated in
that conflict were under the impression that if we were triumphant
over fascism and the Nazis, the men and women who returned from that
conflict would be celebrated and honored by our nation. Many of us
went off to that war and didn't have the right to vote. Many of us
went off to that war and didn't have the right to participate in the
American Dream. We didn't think about this thing as a dream until Dr.
King articulated it.” - HARRY BELAFONTE, Singer and activist.
It
is not just enough to have a dream, you must articulate it in order
to bring it into fruition. It is not just enough to have a dream. You
must have a strategy, you must have a solid idea of what that dream
means in order to execute its vision. This is the process of
innovation. Leaders do it first. It is the idea of creation. They
bring something new into the world and it is what defines our culture
and stirs our purpose of who and what we are as a people. As a
charismatic leader, MLK did not just bring his dream to the table, he
set the table for the feast of all dreams. This is servant
leadership. He put the power in the people's hands and allowed them
to discover a new identity. Authorship to a truthful identity is how
his servant leadership addressed being first, by addressing the
natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first.
Leader-first and Servant-first
are two different extremes that MLK distinguished explicitly. In
between these extremes there are many blends of leadership and he
sought an agreement between these oppositions, an eloquent balance by
being a complexity of a servant-leader and a charismatic leader.
MLK:
“Let me rush on to my conclusion because I want you to
see what Jesus was really saying... 'Oh I see... You want to be
first. You want to be great. You want to be important. You want to be
significant. WELL YOU OUGHT TO BE. If you want to be my disciple,
YOU MUST BE.' He re-ordered priorities and he said, 'YES, Don't
give up this instinct! It's a good instinct if you use it right. It's
a good instinct if you don't distort it or pervert it. Don't give it
up! Keep feeling the need for being important. Keep feeling the need
for being first. But I want you to be first, in love. I want you to
be first in moral excellence. I want you to be first in generosity.
That is what I want you to do.' And he transformed the situation by
giving a new definition of greatness. And you know how he said it, he
said, “Now, brethren, I can't give you greatness. And rather, I
can't make you first,' this is what Jesus said to James and John,
'You must earn it. True greatness comes NOT by favoritism but by
fitness. And the right hand and the left are not mine to give. They
belong to those who are prepared.' And so Jesus gave us a new norm
of greatness. If you want to be important, wonderful. If you want to
be recognized, wonderful. If you want to be great, wonderful! But
recognize, he who is greatest among you shall be your servant.'
That's the new definition of greatness. This morning, the thing that
I like about it, by giving that definition of greatness means that
everybody can be great... because everybody can serve. You don't have
to have a college degree to serve. You don't have to make your
subject and your verb agree to serve. You don't have to know about
Plato and Aristotle to serve. You don't have to know about
Einstein's theory of relativity to serve. You don't have to know the
second theory of thermodynamics to serve. You only need a heart full
of grace. A soul generated by love. And you can be that servant.”
When
one talks about what they believe, they attract others who believe
what they believe. Why is it important to attract those who believe
what you believe? The law of diffusion of innovation
can be applied here. You don't have to know the law to know the
arc... There are those who do things first followed by those who
early adopt the concept, followed by early majority, late majority
supporters, ended with laggards (those who have no option but to join
or be left behind). Different parts of the arc effect different parts
of our lives at different times. The law of diffusion of
innovation tells us if one wants
to achieve mass acceptance, mass support, mass impact... one cannot
have it until a tipping point is achieved between the
innovators/early adopters and the early majority. Then the concept is
set into motion. The problem is how does one find the early adopters
before one can tip the system?... How do you find those who believe
in what you believe? This is the divide that solidarity can resolve.
The early majority will not try something until someone else has
tried or done it first. It is in creation that innovation reigns
supreme. This is where authenticity can set a binary system into
motion. MLK was comfortable with his instinct, he was comfortable
with himself. His intuition was not intimidated by limitations and
obstacles. He along with Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, Stokely Carmichael,
and the many more that contributed to the Civil-Rights-Movement did
it first. They didn't do it to lead people out of oppression, to be a
“leader”... They did it for themselves. They were first. Others
didn't follow them because of WHAT they did, they followed them
because of WHY they did it. What they did is evidence, proof of what
they believe. People will do the things to prove what they believe.
This is how they gathered support, by identifying. The reason MLK and
the others “Fought the Good Fight” is because of how they saw the
world and what they were capable of to change it. They wanted
everyone to see them. They did it to free themselves and in the
process, they freed a nation. They were first.
What
would've happened if MLK did not have the desire to take up his
position? How would it have effected the course of history? MLK
publicly realized his own limitations and mortality. It was in this
aspect which he emphasized equality. He did not want his followers to
place too much faith in his abilities to offer guidance and lead them
in movement. He wanted them to understand and grasp these qualities
within themselves so that everyone was equal on the same scale, on
the same level. It was his way of equalizing everyone. It was the
solution that everyone was fighting for, equality.
August
28, 1963. A quarter of a million Americans, black and white, young
and old, men and women, in a show of solidarity, march to the
nation's capitol with one thing in mind... FREEDOM. Freedom from
segregation, from prejudice, from oppression. It was called the March
for Jobs and Freedom but it will be remembered as the tipping point
for the fight for civil-rights. Among the speakers,
Martin-Luther-King-Jr electrified and inspired the hundreds of
thousands with his “I Have A Dream...” speech. MLK hoped a
massive and peaceful march to Washington would spur passage of the
civil-rights bill. The city braced themselves for violence but the
threat was unfounded. It was to be “The greatest demonstration for
freedom in the history of our nation.” Not to mention, the largest
our nation had ever seen to that day.
How
was MLK to deliver a nation from oppression? How was he to raise a
kingdom from ashes? Through ethos, pathos, and logos did MLK deliver
thee most inspiring and liberating rhetoric which articulated the
American dream. MLK used vivid language. “America has defaulted on
the promissory note of 'Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of
Happiness',” this is a bank checking metaphor which related to the
campaigns boycotts and the value of African-American dollar. It was
only one of the angles his speech leveraged as one of the greatest
calls to action.
Two
hundred and fifty thousand people descended upon our nation's capital
that summer to hear Doctor King's address. There were no invitations
sent out. There were no fliers, no website, yet two hundred fifty
thousand people showed up... How does one do that? MLK wasn't the
only greatest American orator at the time. He wasn't the only man in
America who suffered before civil-rights. In fact, some of his ideas
were left unexplored. But he had a gift. He didn't base his rhetoric
on criticism of what was wrong with America. He based his rhetoric on
what he believed. He was fiercely anaphoric in his beliefs, “I
believe, I believe...” People who believed in what he believed
adopted his cause as their own. Those people assimilated with more
people who shared the same beliefs. Soon people began to organize
structures to get the word out to even more people. And even more
people joined the cause, sharing in the same beliefs of equality. And
to everyone's surprise, two hundred and fifty thousand people showed
up at the right day, the right time, the right place to hear MLK
speak. How many showed up for MLK? Zero. These people assembled for
themselves.
The
shared beliefs and values they had in common about the American dream
and that is what gave them the strength and courage to get on a bus
and travel to the capital in the middle of a hot summer. It was their
shared beliefs that unified black and white in the march that day.
MLK believed there are two types of laws in this world, those that
are divine and those that are man-made. We will not be free in a just
world until those two types are consistent with one another. The
civil-rights movement just happened to be the perfect movement to
bring his cause into motion. MLK stated he had a “dream” not an
“agenda” because dreams are not a politically structured
paradigm. They are visions, connections to alternate dimensions that
can be ideal to manifest. Political agendas cannot inspire on this
level, if at all. There are different types of leaders. There are
those who hold a position of power and authority driven by ego and
there are those who are selfless by their ego and they lead to
inspire. When we are inspired by servant leaders, charismatic
leaders, respectful leaders, we are inspired to be like them. We
follow them because we have an affinity to, not because we are forced
to. When those leaders start with WHY they do what they do, they tap
into the capability of inspiring those around them. At the same time,
it is an invitation to those individuals or organizations who inspire
them as well.
People
followed Martin Luther King not for him, but for themselves. In this
solidarity they found the capability of tapping into a different
consciousness. Martin Luther King connected to the audience by making
them feel safe in trust. Everyone at that same place and time on our
nation's capital that day was capable of being a servant to one
another, capable of change, capable of leading. They were all capable
of changing people's lives, lifting people's spirits, making people
think, and getting people to believe in their dreams. That is what
innovation is about. Innovation is about creation, and creation is
about life, and life is about unity. Martin Luther King brought
people together and united them for a common cause. He had an idea,
a dream, and he brought it to life. When he stepped out on that stage
he connected with the audience and they became one of him. Everyone
connected. The speakers and activists were equal. And the marchers in
the audience were equal. Everyone was equal.
References and Works Cited:
1.
Carson, C. (1987). Martin Luther King, Jr.: Charismatic Leadership
in a Mass Struggle. Journal
Of American History, 74(2),
448-454.
2.
Britannica.com
3.
Pickert, K., Belafonte, H., Thomas, H., Horowitz, R., Zellner, B.,
Lewis, J., & ... Smith, J. (2013). One March. Time, 182(9),
46.
4.
Mwita, M. (2004). Martin Luther King Jr.'s Lifestyle and Social
Interest in His Autobiographical Early Memories. Journal
Of Individual Psychology, 60(2),
191-203.
5. EDWARDS,
K. (. (2010, Summer2010). REMEMBERING DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING,
JR. Journal
of Cultural Diversity.
p. 43.
6. Maddox
Jr., A. H. (2008, April 3). Forty years after Dr. Martin L. King,
Jr. New
York Amsterdam News.
pp. 12-13.
7. YOUNGE,
G. (2013). THE SPEECH. Nation, 297(9/10),
12-18.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)















